Not true all what we hear!

This news has been read 23770 times!

Underdeveloped societies complain about the phenomenon of naivety and this is normal, but it becomes a real problem when societies believe in the unseen and in conspiracy theories to the extent they almost have an innate tendency to believe almost any and every issue or news even if it is unreasonable, and some even continue believing lies and keep spreading these lies happily.

Doubting what these people say means rebellion or skepticism, and confronting it requires the certainty of truth of what they say, and this means exerting efforts in research, questioning and reading, all of which do not fall within our habits or form the core of our traditions.

Our school curricula, and what we believe in with regards to superstitions discourage us to think critically, so we seek to find a dictator or (*) demagogue to follow. This relieves us psychologically and throws responsibility and guilt on our tired shoulders from the daily worry of securing a living.

A famous preacher during a lecture said the apes forbid adultery, and that they stone to death adulterous apes.

The preacher did mention the scientific references to his fictional story which his listeners believed. What this ignorant person does not know is that all animals, including humans, did not know anything called adultery in their history according to our current concept which is a relatively recent system dating back to a few thousand years, and was followed according to certain requirements and religious instructions.

Also, consanguineous marriage differs from one environment to another and from followers of a religious belief to others, and the Pharaohs, and others were not prohibited from what we now call incestuous marriage.

On the other hand, the academician Abdullah Al-Nafisi gave a lecture, the link of which was recently spread everywhere, in which he mentioned that Henry Kissinger boarded the plane and headed to Saudi Arabia when he heard about King Faisal’s intention to start cultivating wheat in the Kingdom.

He added Kissinger did not succeed in dissuading the king from his decision, and he left the kingdom in anger and held a press conference at the Riyadh airport in which he announced the failure of his endeavor, and that Saudi Arabia would be forced to drink its oil.

Returning to the documents, and to the logic before them, we found that everything that was said was pure fiction. The foreign minister of the greatest country does not even need to board a plane and travel 15,000 kilometers to say something that can be said on a phone or through ambassadors and others.

In addition, the press coverage written by Bernard Gwertzman in the New York Times on February 16, 1975 did not include any indication, even fleeting, of the existence of differences between the two countries at the time, or that Kissinger had issued a threat neither did he mention it in his press conference at Riyadh airport, with Sheikh Ahmad Zaki Al Yamani. He only said he was happy to meet the King.

I have evidence to prove my words. Does the professor have anything to prove his claims?

For your information, since the mid-1970s, Saudi Arabia has expanded wheat cultivation, and has had never to drink oil and it stopped cultivating it after years, and for reasons  unrelated to Kissinger’s threats, then it finally returned to cultivating it.

(*) A demagogue is someone who tries to win others over by exploiting their fears and inciting their hatred for certain groups, just as Adolf Hitler tried to convince his people that the Jews were the cause of all their troubles.

e-mail: [email protected]

By Ahmad alsarraf

This news has been read 23770 times!

Related Articles

Back to top button

Advt Blocker Detected

Kindly disable the Ad blocker

Verified by MonsterInsights