Thousands hide from ‘crackdown’ – TV channel to be penalized

This news has been read 3743 times!

Kashmiri protesters  run as they hold stones and bricks before throwing them at government forces on the outskirts of Srinagar, Indian-controlled Kashmir on Nov 4. Government forces fired tear-gas and shotgun pellets to stop rock-throwing protesters after Friday prayers in the main city of Indian-controlled Kashmir. (AP)
Kashmiri protesters run as they hold stones and bricks before throwing them at government forces on the outskirts of Srinagar, Indian-controlled Kashmir on Nov 4. Government forces fired tear-gas and shotgun pellets to stop rock-throwing protesters after Friday prayers in the main city of Indian-controlled Kashmir. (AP)

KULGAM, India, Nov 4, (AP): Deep within a vast orchard, dozens of young Kashmiris laze in the shade of apple trees. Surrounded by boxes of fruit, they chat and crack jokes. Some play video games on their phones. For now, they’re at ease, the hilly grove providing a perfect hideaway from Indian police and paramilitary soldiers deployed to hunt them down.

But with winter approaching, the men take refuge at night in the homes of friends or distant relatives, changing location every few days and passing messages to loved ones through supporters and friends. They worry about putting others at risk amid India’s largest-ever crackdown on unarmed civilians, launched to quell an anti-India uprising that has kept this Himalayan territory in virtual lockdown since July.

More than 8,000 people, mostly teenage boys and young men, have been rounded up and put in jail. Thousands more are being sought as suspects, but police refuse to give an actual count, saying the number is constantly changing.

Authorities say the suspects pose security risks, having hurled rocks at government forces or clashed with police. Some are suspected of aiding or joining separatist rebels fighting for Kashmir’s independence or its merger with neighboring Pakistan. But many are simply identified as having taken part in what India says are illegal protests.

Those dodging arrest by hiding in Kashmir’s many apple orchards say they’re being unfairly targeted by Indian forces bent on criminalizing dissent.

Abandon

His cousin said he had to abandon his science studies to go into hiding. “I want to become a doctor,” he said. “But for now, the police have made me a fugitive.”

The crackdown is part of a decades-long cycle of conflict and rebellion that has bedeviled Kashmir since India and Pakistan won independence in 1947. Shortly thereafter they fought their first war over the territory, splitting the picturesque region between the two countries by a United Nations-drawn ceasefire line, now known as the line of control. They fought a second war over the region in 1972.

Many in the mostly Muslim region see India as an occupying force, and resent the hundreds of thousands of troops deployed with special powers to shoot suspects on sight while being immune from prosecution. India blames Pakistan for training, arming and sheltering separatist rebels who began fighting Indian forces in 1989. Nearly 70,000 people have been killed in the conflict. Pakistan denies the allegations, saying it offers only moral support to rebels and Kashmiri civilians.

This year’s violence erupted following the July 8 killing of a popular rebel commander by Indian forces. There have been almost daily protests since then, often with stone-throwing youths clashing with police and paramilitary forces firing pellets and bullets into the crowds. Indian authorities also have staged months of nighttime raids.

At least 90 civilians and two policemen have been killed, with thousands more injured, most of them civilians. Curfews, communication blackouts, roadblocks and separatist-sponsored strikes have largely paralyzed public life.

A top police officer in the main city of Srinagar said nearly 500 of the more than 8,000 suspects detained had been arrested under a law that allows them to be held for up to two years without charge. He and other officials spoke on condition of anonymity because police and army policies bar them from speaking to reporters on the record.

“A tough approach to deal with protests has worked,” one army officer said at a military camp near the urban center of Anantnag. “Unfortunately, people will suffer.”

Fears

Yet inside one police barrack last week, uniformed Kashmiri officers admitted fears of their own. One constable said an angry crowd told his family they would torch their home if they saw him in uniform again. Another said he joined in a protest while on vacation; he nearly lost his job, but avoided retribution from neighbors angry over his job.

“I had no choice. That was the only way for me to save myself and my family,” he said.

The uprising has been most pronounced in southern areas famed for their orchards, rice paddies and gently rolling Himalayan foothills. Police officers routinely refer to the cluster of villages between Anantnag and the town of Kulgam as one of the most dangerous trouble spots.

Residents in the area accuse Indian forces of raiding neighborhoods, ransacking homes, beating civilians and firing on more than 300 electricity transformers to cut power to homes. Villages elsewhere have since fortified their transformers with sandbags and wooden logs.

“They come, ransack our homes and hit our mothers and sisters. This humiliation is intolerable,” said a 17-year-old student, wincing with the pain of untreated pellet injuries sustained while resisting a police raid on his village of Hawoora in October. The student, listed as “wanted” by police, has been too afraid to visit a hospital.

He vowed to never surrender, “even if I have to go underground forever.”

Police neither confirm nor deny the allegations. One officer explained: “When we have to put down this nonsense, there are ugly things going to happen. That’s how it is.”

At least some in India agree. Last month in the English daily The Hindu, former national security adviser M.K. Narayanan warned that using force against protesters and would backfire. He said authorities were failing “to deal with the kind of seismic shift occurring beneath the surface in Kashmir.”

Meanwhile, government officials in India have ordered a popular news channel to go off the air for a day over its coverage of an attack on an Indian air base in January.

The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting said in an order Thursday that NDTV India was being penalized for broadcasting sensitive details of the attack on the military base in the northern town of Pathankot that left seven soldiers dead. Authorities have blamed Pakistan-based militants for the attack on the sprawling base that lasted for nearly four days.

The news channel has said its coverage was fair and balanced and didn’t include any details not aired by other news stations. It said it is exploring all legal options to reverse the ban slated for next Wednesday.

The order to ban the channel has been criticized by other media organizations.

The Editors’ Guild of India said the order was unprecedented and that the federal government appeared to have given itself the power “to intervene in the functioning of the media and take arbitrary punitive action as and when it does not agree with the coverage.” The organization, a grouping of the editors of all major newspapers and magazines in the country, said if the government finds any media coverage objectionable, it can approach the courts.

Several prominent journalists also criticized the order.

“The banning of NDTV India is a shocking flexing of govt muscle over free media. Don’t shoot the messenger,” journalist Sagarika Ghose tweeted.

“Govt pulling TV news channels off air is a dangerous trend,” Rahul Kanwal, a top news anchor and editor, said on Twitter.

India routinely asks entertainment TV channels to censor words it deems too racy for local audiences. But the order against NDTV India is the first such ban on a television station for its reporting of a militant attack.

In insurgency-wracked Indian-controlled Kashmir, however, it’s not uncommon for local newspapers to be barred from publishing for several days in a row when cycles of protests and violence flare up.

One newspaper, the Kashmir Reader, has been banned for over a month with officials saying its contents could incite violence.

 

This news has been read 3743 times!

Back to top button

Advt Blocker Detected

Kindly disable the Ad blocker

Verified by MonsterInsights