Moving American University of Beirut to State of Kuwait

This news has been read 77785 times!

The American University of Beirut was  founded 155 years ago by the American  priest Daniel Bliss, and its name was the Syrian  Protestant College before it changed to the current one 100 years ago. Although the name and  background of its founder was missionary work,  it was always a secular institution. The teaching curriculum in its first year included Arabic, English, and French, Turkish,  Latin, mathematics, ancient Arab history and the  history of religions, including Judaism.

A year later, pharmacy and medicine became  part of its curricula in which many elite graduated, some of whom became enlightened politicians. The university also contributed to making  Beirut a publishing center in the region when  it transferred its printing press from Malta. The  university also followed high educational standards and values and a strict American curriculum, and was the first in the region to rely on  the principles of critical thinking and open and  diverse discussions without discrimination between students, with the support of its founder,  priest Daniel Bliss.

With the collapse of the security, economic, social, political, and even moral situation in Lebanon, and the financial difficulties that the university is facing, its administration decided to close its doors, or move to another country, especially since there was  no objection to the intention to close as this institution was not once a source of wealth for any of  them as was the case with diesel, garbage collection, and soil plunder. With the spread of news of the intention to close, the name of Kuwait emerged at the top of the countries to move to, so officials were contacted and the idea was welcomed by them.

After exchanging bureaucratic correspondences and communications that lasted for  months, the Kuwaiti Ministry of Higher Education set the following conditions for the university’s transfer: Changing its ancient name to become ‘Kuwait National University; segregation of students; allowing men to wear national dress;  allowing females to wear the hijab and niqab;  allocating specific colleges for cooking and  home education for girls; allowing the opening  of Islamic places of worship within its campus;  preventing the study of critical thinking, and  distorted dialectical theories such as the Darwin’s theory.

This is in allowing charities to open branches within the university; allocating 30% of the  university’s majors to study religious sciences,  Islamic only; restricting teaching to theoretical  subjects and refusing to transfer the university  hospital with it, because there is a full hospital  in the fair ground and the necessity to obtain the  approval of the Ministry of Information before  holding any concerts and the approval of the  Ministry of Interior for any debates as well as  the approval of the Ministry of Commerce for  any competitions. The university administration met in Beirut  and decided, within seconds, to reject the conditions and to consider moving to another country.

Of course, the above statement is not true, but  it is very close to reality. If any educational body  at the level of the American University thought  of transferring its activities to Kuwait, the forces  of backwardness and darkness would be on the  lookout, with the support of the representatives  of ‘Give us money’. I do not know why I remembered Noah, as  I finished this article, and the difficulties he  would have faced, and how many licenses he  had to extract before he hammered a single  nail into the project to build his ‘Ark’ in Kuwait, and how the land would sink before the  licenses were issued.

❑ ❑ ❑

e-mail:[email protected]

By Ahmad alsarraf

This news has been read 77785 times!

Back to top button

Advt Blocker Detected

Kindly disable the Ad blocker

Verified by MonsterInsights