Tuesday, November 10, 2026
 
search-icon
search-icon
close-icon

Misfortune makes strange bedfellows

publish time

10/11/2026

publish time

10/11/2026

Misfortune makes strange bedfellows
Add as Preferred Source on Google

The inescapable geographical realities have forced the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member states to adopt a pragmatic stance on Iran. This stance brings to mind the famous verse of poet Abu al-Tayyib Al-Mutanabbi: “It is indeed difficult for a free-spirited soul to be forced into befriending an adversary it cannot avoid.” Historical relations have long been marked by Persian hostility toward the people in the region— a dynamic that persisted even after Persia embraced Islam.

An imperial mindset based on the belief that they are inherently superior to surrounding nations is at the heart of their ideology. Nevertheless, geographic proximity makes maintaining some level of engagement unavoidable. Against this backdrop, current reports indicating progress toward the US-Iran agreement, along with Western and European media commentary that GCC nations favor resolving the conflict and normalizing conditions, bring to mind the verse of Arab poet Nasr ibn Sayyar: “I spot the faint glow of burning embers buried beneath the ashes.”

On the other hand, this strategy could be an Iranian tactic to assert its terms over the Arab Gulf states and America. They promote the illusion of an imminent agreement structured around their own demands—a deal anchored on the critical issue of Tehran’s ambition for a military nuclear capability despite official claims of ‘peaceful’ intentions.

The statements of military officials and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) must be scrutinized, particularly their warning that “any new aggression will not remain confined within the narrow geographical boundaries, as it could extend to the military bases or parties supporting hostile operations.” From a political standpoint, such a warning is a signal that Iran claims to reach targets at will, potentially extending to Europe. This stance indicates that the ‘peaceful’ nuclear initiative assurance is a deceptive facade to counter ambitions that the US-Israeli campaign initiated. Heavy sanctions imposed by the United States are considered a major setback to the militarization of Tehran's nuclear endeavor.

At the same time, the intensified maritime and land blockades support an international goal -- gradual weakening of the regime, as proven by the recent developments.

Modern history reflects the same ancient patterns, as Iran’s ability for political maneuvering is becoming more sophisticated. By deploying sectarian proxy networks—a strategy akin to the ‘Trojan horse ’- Tehran has extended its reach beyond Lebanon, Syria and Iraq to include Yemen and other countries. It has infused the Arab and non-Arab intellectual and cultural fields with its altered ideological framework.

A thorough assessment of Abu al- Tayyib’s third verse in the context of the regional neighbors of Iran exposed the reality of the Persian ethos driven by an intense and deep-seated desire for revenge. This underlying nature continues whether an Iranian presents himself as a harmless lamb or a devoted and affectionate ally. The poet captured such a disposition with striking accuracy when he said: “The absolute peak of hypocrisy is when a person smiles and acts completely cool to your face, while secretly burning with toxic hatred inside.”