Media outlets seek payment for articles utilized in ChatGPT’s content

This news has been read 926 times!

NEW YORK, Oct 22, (Agencies): In the era of generative artificial intelligence, major newspapers are engaging in discussions with OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, to secure their share of digital news stories. Tech companies have traditionally used news stories to train AI models, but as the demand for advanced AI grows, newspaper publishers and data owners are demanding a piece of the potentially lucrative generative AI market, projected to reach $1.3 trillion by 2032.

Since August, over 535 news organizations, including prestigious outlets like The New York Times, Reuters, and The Washington Post, have implemented blockers to prevent their content from being used to train AI models like ChatGPT. Talks are now centered around compensating publishers, allowing the chatbot to reference specific news stories in its responses. This approach benefits newspapers by providing direct payment and potentially increasing website traffic.

Additionally, Reddit, the popular social message board, is exploring options to charge generative AI companies for its data. If an agreement isn’t reached, Reddit may restrict its content behind a login page, potentially reducing its visibility in Google searches.

In a separate development, Elon Musk began charging $42,000 for bulk access to Twitter posts to address AI companies’ alleged misuse of data for training. These actions reflect the increasing urgency and uncertainty surrounding the profits generated from online information in the age of generative AI.

Despite the demands for compensation, leading AI firms face a growing number of copyright lawsuits from individual content creators seeking damages and a share of the profits. Trade groups are advocating for collective bargaining rights with tech companies.

OpenAI’s willingness to negotiate may be an attempt to establish agreements before legal obligations to license and pay for content are legally determined. Nearly $16 billion in venture capital has poured into generative AI in 2023, highlighting the industry’s substantial costs. Tech companies have been reluctant to pay for data in the past, relying on free and accessible resources.

As the battle for data ownership and compensation unfolds, publishers seek to find strength in numbers. Data holders with a history of asserting intellectual property rights are in a better position to negotiate deals. Companies like Shutterstock have partnered to provide training data for AI, launching initiatives to compensate artists for their work.

The debate over data ownership and compensation is gaining momentum as the generative AI landscape continues to evolve, emphasizing the importance of quality content and journalism for society and AI development.

This news has been read 926 times!