KUWAIT CITY, Sept 26, (Agencies): Kuwait’s ranking in the Global Competitiveness Index dropped from 38th with a score of 4.53 in 2016-2017 to 52nd out of 137 countries with a score of 4.4 in 2017-2018. According to the report released by World Economic Forum, competitiveness is defined as the set of institutions, policies and factors which determine the level of productivity of an economy, and this in turn, establishes the level of prosperity that the country can achieve. Indicators capturing the concepts which are essential for productivity and long-term prosperity are grouped into 12 pillars — institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomic environment, health and primary education, higher education and training, goods market effi- ciency, labor market efficiency, financial market development, technological readiness, market size, business sophistication, and innovation.
The country ranked 57th with a score of 4.0 in the first pillar (institutions), 64th with a score of 4.3 in the second pillar (infrastructure), 30th with a score of 5.6 in the third pillar (macroeconomic environment), 83rd with a score of 5.6 in the fourth pillar (health and primary education), 95th with a score of 3.9 in the fifth pillar (higher education and training), 89th with a score of 4.2 percent in the sixth pillar (goods market efficiency), 119th with a score of 3.6 in the seventh pillar (labor market efficiency), 62nd with a score of 4.1 in the eighth pillar (financial market development), 68th with a score of 4.3 in the ninth pillar (technological readiness), 50th with a score of 4.4 in the 10th pillar (market size), 70th with a score of 4.0 in the 11th pillar (business sophistication) and 103rd with a score of 3.0 in the 12th pillar (innovation).
According to the report, Kuwait dropped to 52nd, mostly on the back of a deterioration in macroeconomic environment and, following a revision of ICT indicators previously published by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), in technological readiness. With the continuous decline in oil and gas prices in the global market, the country had a budget deficit last year (from a surplus of 1.2 percent of GDP to a deficit of 3.6 percent of GDP) while its debt increased.
To overcome challenges caused by the continuous oil price decline, the country must expand its innovation capacity by investing in higher education and training. It must also strive to have a more inclusive and efficient labor market in order to fully utilize its human capital. Kuwait scored fifth regionally.
In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), the United Arab Emirates (UAE) got the highest rank among countries in the region as it landed on the 17th spot globally, followed by Qatar which ranked 25th and Saudi Arabia which ranked 30th; while the most-improved country is Egypt as it went up several notches — from 115th last year to 101st this year.
Ten years on from the global financial crisis, the prospects for a sustained economic recovery remain at risk due to a widespread failure on the part of leaders and policy-makers to put in place reforms necessary to underpin competitiveness and bring about much-needed increases in productivity, according to the report. The report is an annual assessment of the factors driving countries’ productivity and prosperity.
For the ninth consecutive year, the report’s Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) finds Switzerland to be the world’s most competitive economy, narrowly ahead of the United States and Singapore. Other G20 economies in the top 10 are Germany (5), the United Kingdom (8) and Japan (9). China is the highest ranking among the BRICS group of large emerging markets, moving up one rank to 27. Drawing on data going back 10 years, the report highlights in particular three areas of greatest concern. These include the financial system, where levels of “soundness” have yet to recover from the shock of 2007 and in some parts of the world are declining further.
This is especially of concern given the important role the financial system will need to play in facilitating investment in innovation related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Another key finding is that competitiveness is enhanced, not weakened, by combining degrees of flexibility within the labour force with adequate protection of workers’ rights. With vast numbers of jobs set to be disrupted as a result of automation and robotization, creating conditions that can withstand economic shock and support workers through transition periods will be vital.
GCI data also suggests that the reason innovation often fails to ignite productivity is due to an imbalance between investments in technology and efforts to promote its adoption throughout the wider economy. “Global competitiveness will be more and more defined by the innovative capacity of a country. Talents will become increasingly more important than capital and therefore the world is moving from the age of capitalism into the age of talentism. Countries preparing for the Fourth Industrial Revolution and simultaneously strengthening their political, economic and social systems will be the winners in the competitive race of the future,” said Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum.
The Global Competitiveness Index in 2017 With Switzerland, Netherlands and Germany remaining stable on first, fourth and fifth spots respectively, the only changes in the top five apply to the United States and Singapore, which swap second and third positions.
Elsewhere in the top 10 the big winner is Hong Kong SAR, which jumps three places to sixth, edging out Sweden (7), UK (8) and Japan (9), all of which decline one place, with Finland holding stable in 10th position.
In Europe, the region’s third-largest economy, France, is edged out one position to 22. Elsewhere, there seems little sign of improvement in addressing the region’s north-south divide with little change in the rankings of Spain (34), Italy (43), or Greece (87).
Portugal does excel though, climbing four places ahead of Italy to 42. General trends over the past decade have seen an improvement in aspects of Europe’s innovation ecosystems but a worrying deterioration in some important education indicators.
Russia improves five positions, moving to 38. Improvements in basic requirements and innovation drive the increase. North America remains one of the most competitive regions in the world. Leading in innovation, business sophistication and technological readiness, and ranking close to the top in the other pillars of competitiveness.
The United States rises to number 2 and Canada also improves one position to 14. Among the 17 East Asia and Pacific economies covered, 13 have increased their overall score — albeit marginally — with Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam making the largest strides since last year. Singapore, the most competitive economy in the region, slipped from second to third place, while Hong Kong advanced from ninth to sixth place — passing Japan, now ranked ninth. There have been signs of a productivity slowdown among the region’s advanced economies and in China, suggesting the need to pursue efforts to further increase technological readiness and promote innovation. India (40th) remains the most competitive country in South Asia, as most countries in the region improve their performance.
The two Himalayan countries of Bhutan (82nd, up 15) and Nepal (88th, up ten) are among the most improved countries globally while Pakistan (115th, up seven) and Bangladesh (99th, up seven) have both improved their scores across all pillars of competitiveness.
Improving ICT infrastructure and use remain among the biggest challenges for the region: in the past decade, technological readiness stagnated the most in South Asia. Latin America and the Caribbean have seen 10 years of continued improvement in competitiveness.
Chile continues to lead the region at placing 33, followed by Costa Rica ranked 47 and improving seven positions. Panama comes next, ranking 50 and falling eight positions.
Argentina showed most improvement, placing 92 and going up 12 positions. Brazil stabilizes at 80, improving one position, as well as Mexico ranked 51st. Colombia and Peru each fall five positions, ranking 66 and 72 respectively. Last in the region comes Haiti and Venezuela.
On average, sub-Saharan Africa’s competitiveness has not changed significantly over the past decade and only a handful of countries (Ethiopia 108, Senegal 106, Tanzania 113, Uganda 114) are continuing to improve this year. Leading the ranking in the region come Mauritius (45), Rwanda (58), South Africa (61) and Botswana (63). In general, Africa is still being penalized by its macroeconomic environment. Average inflation grew to double digits last year while public finances are still being affected by relatively low commodity prices, which curbed public revenues and hence government investments. At the same time, Africa’s financial markets and infrastructures remain underdeveloped, and institutions’ improvement process hit a setback this year as political uncertainty is growing in key countries.
“Countries must establish an environment that enables citizens and businesses to create, develop and implement new ideas that will allow them to progress and grow. The Global Competitiveness Report helps us understand the drivers of innovation and growth and this edition comes at a time when increasing the ability of countries to adopt innovations is critical to achieving broad-based growth and economic progress,” said Xavier Sala-i-Martin, Professor of Economics at Columbia University.