28/03/2026
28/03/2026
The data indicated that 49,763 cases were registered in 2025, an increase of 7.6 percent compared to the previous year, with the rate of cases concluded reaching 97.5 percent or a total of 48,533 cases -- 61 percent of which were referred to the criminal courts, 37.7 percent were dismissed, and 1.3 percent were deferred due to lack of jurisdiction.
The data showed that the number of judgments issued reached 50,567, with convictions constituting 88 percent (44,480 judgments), compared to 12 percent acquittals, indicating the strength of judicial outcomes. The prosecution handled 11,807 appeals against judgments, 10,730 of which were appeals within the legal guarantees for litigants and the right to a two-tiered judicial process
Crimes related to journalism, media and information technology rose by 31.1 percent or 5,323 cases -- the highest level in recent years. Misappropriation of public funds decreased by 67 percent or 73 cases, the lowest level recorded in recent years. Refusal to execute judgments rose to 624, while money laundering cases reached 207. On the other hand, forgery of official documents decreased to 493, drug-related crimes declined to 3,066 cases, juvenile delinquency cases decreased to 3,486, and domestic violence cases fell to 2,010 -- a positive indicator of improvement in some aspects of society.
Crimes involving forgery of banknotes reached 3,822 cases, a significant increase, alongside a surge in human trafficking crimes, albeit limited in number. This shows the rise of new criminal patterns. The Commercial Affairs Prosecution Office dealt with the highest number of cases at 7,799, followed by the Ahmadi and Mubarak Al- Kabeer prosecutions and then the Media, Information and Publishing Prosecution Office.
The number of defendants reached 50,459, with males constituting 84.9 percent and the 30-39 age group recorded the highest percentage. The Public Prosecution has 506 members -- 17.4 percent of whom are women, indicating the development of institutional efficiency. It affirmed that this report is part of its commitment to maintain transparency and keep the public informed about its performance indicators in order to develop judicial policies and performance efficiency.
