28/04/2026
28/04/2026
However, he failed to fulfill his obligation to pay the agreed amount, prompting them to seek legal recourse to claim their rights. The Court of First Instance dismissed the case, but the Court of Appeals found the ruling flawed in terms of the application of the law and deficient in its reasoning. The Court of Appeals affirmed the defendant’s obligation to pay the value of the disputed shares, as per the signed contract and the documents related to the case. The court also ruled the case inadmissible against the second respondent, because it was filed against an unauthorized party. The two women were represented by Attorney Houra Al-Habib who presented arguments and submitted memoranda and documents affirming her clients’ rights, which the court upheld in its final ruling.
