Saturday, March 14, 2026
 
search-icon
search-icon
close-icon

Capital flight from war zones to safer havens

publish time

14/03/2026

publish time

14/03/2026

Capital flight from war zones to safer havens

KUWAIT CITY, March 14: With escalating tensions surrounding the war in Iran, old fears have resurfaced in global financial markets. Attention has turned to the flight of capital from conflict zones to safe havens. This development raises profound questions about the fate of trillions of dollars in Gulf sovereign wealth funds and the ability of global financial markets to absorb any sudden shifts in investment flows.

According to a report published by Logos Press, any change in the investment strategies of Gulf sovereign wealth funds could have far-reaching consequences for the global financial system, given the enormous size of the assets these funds manage. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries possess some of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, which play a pivotal role in financing major corporations, infrastructure and international financial markets. Economic estimates indicate that these funds collectively manage several trillion dollars, making any adjustment to their investment policies a significant factor in global capital flows. In times of geopolitical crisis, investors typically flock to deeper, more liquid and more stable markets. This is why the United States remains the most likely destination for any potential redirection of capital.

Plans
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) previously announced plans to invest up to $1.4 trillion in the US economy, while Qatar plans to invest around $500 billion in the United States over the next decade. This trend reinforces the dollar’s historical role as a safe-haven currency. Reserve Bank of Australia Deputy Governor Andrew Hauser said the dollar continues to demonstrate “stability as a hedge currency in times of uncertainty,” according to Reuters.

Despite the seriousness of the scenarios being discussed, current data indicate that global financial markets have not yet reacted sharply to developments related to the war. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon said at an investment summit in Sydney that the market reaction has been surprisingly muted so far, according to the New York Post.

Analysts believe that investors typically change their strategies when conflict begins to impact global economic growth or international energy and trade chains. Is a silent ‘capital flight’ beginning? Despite the lack of conclusive evidence of a widespread capital exodus from the Gulf, some indicators suggest a gradual shift in investor behavior. These include increased demand for US bonds, a rise in the share of liquid assets in investment portfolios, and the postponement of longterm investments in areas of tension.

System
Economic experts emphasize that the Gulf financial system is deeply integrated into global markets, allowing its sovereign wealth funds to quickly restructure their investments should circumstances require it. In spite of the geographical proximity of Gulf states to the epicenter of tension, their economies have several factors that mitigate the impact. These factors include substantial government financial reserves, diversified foreign investments through sovereign wealth funds, and a strong banking sector and liquidity in financial markets. However, the region remains vulnerable to any disruptions that could affect energy markets or shipping lanes in the Gulf, which could, in turn, impact global investments.

Reports from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank indicate that the Gulf region has become one of the largest sources of global investment capital over the past decade, making its financial stability a crucial factor in the equilibrium of international markets. Analysts believe that the decisive factor in the coming period will be the decisions of the investment committees of Gulf sovereign wealth funds.

In a world governed by trillions of dollars, a single investment decision could redirect enormous capital flows between markets. This is why major investment banks are currently monitoring two key indicators -- the volume of inflows into US Treasury bonds and new investments in Middle Eastern funds. If these indicators accelerate, talk of ‘capital flight’ could transform from a mere hypothesis into a new reality that reshapes the global financial landscape.

Reports from Goldman Sachs and the news agencies Reuters and the Associated Press indicate that historical experience suggests financial markets often go through three phases when wars break out: an initial decline due to fear, followed by a period of volatility, and then a gradual recovery as the conflict’s contours become clearer. Global market data provides several examples as follows: - During the 1990 Gulf War, following the invasion of Kuwait, the S&P 500 index fell by about 16 percent between July and October 1990 due to the oil shock and recession fears, before recovering strongly and rising by about 26 percent during 1991. - When the Iraq War broke out in 2003, US stocks subsequently rose, with the index ending the year with gains of nearly 26 percent after the uncertainty subsided. - After the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, US markets fell by about 3.8 percent on the first day, and the decline later reached about 19.8 percent before recovering. - In the 2022 Russian-Ukrainian War, global markets initially fell by about six to sevent percent before recovering a significant portion of their losses within weeks. Investment studies indicate that the average decline in global markets during major military events is only about four to six percent before a recovery phase begins. Also, oil is the first market to be affected by any conflict in the Middle East, given that the region produces about a third of the world’s oil supply and controls strategic maritime chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz.

Oil price
Historical data revealed sharp price spikes during wars: - During the 1990–1991 Gulf War, prices rose from $17 to $41 per barrel, an increase of 141 percent. - During the 2003 Iraq War, oil prices climbed from about $25 to $35, an increase of nearly 40 percent. - During the 2011 Libyan Crisis, oil prices rose from $95 to $125 per barrel. - After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2012, oil prices jumped from $75 to $130 per barrel. Moreover, investors are currently focusing on three key indicators to assess the repercussions of the war: oil prices and the possibility of them exceeding $110 or $120, or higher, investment flows toward the dollar and US bonds as safe havens, and the performance of Gulf stock exchanges and energy markets, which are most closely linked to the event. History suggests that financial markets often adapt to conflicts quickly, tending to recover once uncertainty subsides and investors return to reassessing economic fundamentals.

By Inaas Awadh Al-Seyassah/Arab Times Staff